[ b / c / d / f / o / q / r ] [ home ]

/b/ - Random

Off-Topic Discussion
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1456895461226.jpg (264.78 KB, 800x913, 139702132230.jpg)

9f2a5 No.15[Reply]

Since the original discussion thread didn't survive the Second Coming of Pregnarok, I'm remaking one here.

Thread 1

Thread 2
(Current thread as of making this post)

Glad to be back though. It'll probably be a bit slow going as people make their way back and word spreads around. But the most enjoyable part of running this is seeing all the things people say, so feel free to comment to your hearts content. I look forward to seeing what you all have to say again.
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

3e8bc No.868

Thanks for being so open about it! Your willingness to proliferate your Zelda ripoff strengthens the preggo fetishist in us all.

9f2a5 No.869

No problem. After all, I started the thread to help build up activity on the site anyways. More content is more content, and it'll be fun to see what other people make too.

23fa9 No.870

File: 1503161206329.jpg (679.16 KB, 2000x1400, Breath_of_the_Wild_-_Great….jpg)

Hello, I am here because of the discussion in the main thread regarding the reincarnation. I have already stated my opinion on the matter of recursive pregnancy in the main thread and am here to simply discuss other options for it if reincarnation wins. You are free to choose to use these in some form or ignore them entirely, since this is only suggestions from one of your audience members. I am simply presenting an idea I had and mean no offense by it.

The discomfort I personally have with the subject is that a) it would be a baby that is pregnant and b) it is our own child in both senses of the word. Some of the audience agrees, some don't. Now, the ideas I had would address these issues; A) make it so she ages up to a more respectable age like 16-18 when she is born, so that we don't have to deal with the underage aspect, and B) that she obviously has traits that she inherited from neither parent, implying she is not fully our child anymore. She would still be a Wolfos (if born before the curse is lifted), but she would still have some of her traits from her previous life. As you stated it in the main thread, Ghosts and pregnancy have an odd effect on each other, so weird stuff like this may happen. But, as stated before, these are simply ideas I had that you have every right to ignore. I will still follow and participate in the story, no matter your decision. As a show of good will, I present a pregnant Great Fairy from BoTW (drawn by Marazzan) as tribute. This is the first time trying this kind of thing, so please bear with me.

Question on the matter, are you planning for memory retention or blank slate for it? Simply curious.

9f2a5 No.871

No worries, I enjoy all the feedback I can get.

And these are pretty valid alternatives. She would probably end up a blank slate (with a potential repressed memories kind of deal). And this is a bit spoilersb but if she is reincarnated she would likely be very different from her siblings. She would actually be a viable option for a new player character after Anon retires if you guys wanted, but she would have different racial bonuses from her siblings (she'd be born a Red Wolfos instead of a normal Wolfos for example). Heck, she might even reincarnate into a guy, though if she was pregnant then that would be even more potentially unpopular kink overlap. So the guy reincarnation is currently low on the likelyhood scale.

But yeah, if it does end up winning the vote theres a sliding degree of what I would do with the situation. The weirdest I would go is having her be born with a sort of faux ghost pregnancy (either being fatter than she should be, or simply feels heavy despite being skinny) that just sorta sticks around until she's viably old enough for it to actually be real. Or she would be born normal but be haunted by the ghosts of the children she was supposed to have.

Though rapid aging is viable too and it's an option that she can be born an adult if it comes to that. Of course depending how the votes fall we might not even have to worry about this.

499fc No.872

Thank you for responding. Just hoping to help make the scene a less weird than the original idea, even if it doesn't win.

File: 1500264083463.jpg (163.97 KB, 600x600, 1411526580065.jpg)

27f79 No.826[Reply]

If you make fetish related content, can you and do you fap to it?
Personally I can't, I find that anything I draw or edit is impossible to fap to. But maybe that's just me.
3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

ad1c4 No.832

Once i draw something that related to my fetish even if it's looks nice, i can't fap to it

1c679 No.834

I've wondered this very thing many times, so its actually nice to see I'm not the only one thinking about it.

I've put out a lot of content across multiple mediums; so I kinda have to break it down.

Drawings/digital arts: its very hit or miss for me. I rarely like anything I draw, even less so when its character art for some game/anime/whatever I've never heard of. I much prefer stuff that I've come up with, even if its just a request fulfillment and not some new oc with actual story. I have maybe 5 or 6 pics I've drawn in total out of everything that actually trip my trigger.

Written: nope. I can't read and wank. I can do one or the other, not both. I do like some of the ideas I've written, and if I drew them it may be a different story.

Photography: I may suck with a camera, but my partner is my everything, and those pics have served me well on many a lonely night.

So there you have it, more than anyone cared to know about moi. ^_^

48135 No.835

Wish I had a kinky partner too…
So do the 5 or 6 pics you drew have some more kinks that you're into? Or the settings somehow invoke erotic thoughts and such?
Forgive me for asking something so personal, it's just that I've been mulling over the thought of making content for pure selfishness and this thread topic is frightening for me.

75f25 No.866

Yes and yes.

I mean, my situation is kinda different because I do a ton of 3D content. Because unlike a drawing, I can rotate around the character(s) and get a ton of angles where I can view things from.

With that said, I do take advantage of it. Hell, it was the primary reason I got into it. And people seemed to like it so I started sharing.

94f1d No.867

I have never had the time to actually pick up on any form of art skill before and now still, but I've been worried about this fetish of mine for so long.

It may not sound like much but seriously, Thank you for clarifying this. Maybe it will be worth spending sometime on sfm after all.

File: 1501513956707.png (1.38 MB, 1188x1222, 7OahZWC.png)

9e092 No.850[Reply]

I… I just uncovered this…

I should not have. My brain can't… what? What is this?!

7 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

c3a08 No.859

This makes me laugh my ass off.

Okay, some of you MIGHT be a bit young to remember teletubbies when it was new and, if you can imagine (or remember) it, controversial.

People assumed that the purple teletubby had a triangle on its head as a way to signal itself out as a gay icon in entertainment and media to be recognizable to children as a positive thing. And by people I meant the momentum of the anti-gay position of the conservative religious types in the US, whom saw homosexuality as retardation at best and corruption of the soul at worst, making them synonymous to perverts and pedophiles. So understanding that, they hated Po and felt it was a trojan horse for homosexual themes.

And now… they have babies. I'm not sure how or whom, which one of them flopped out those abominate spawn, but if either gender did it, *that is just fucking hilarious*

"No! They're not GAY! They are sexless but gendered, though. Even the men can have babies."

ho-ly-shit you guys. Ho-ly shit.

abf76 No.860

People also thought the purple one was gay because it always carried a purse.

0eab3 No.861

I thought I remembered him to be officially gay but it seems I remembered wrong.

Changing the subject:
>In an unrelated incident, reported in 2000, a girl's Tinky Winky Talk Together toy from Golden Bear reportedly said: "I got a gun!"
Teletubbies controversies are the best.

abf76 No.862

With a name like "Tinky Winky", I don't think that's a gun…

87d87 No.863


I know someone who collected recalled toys. One of the ones he had was a Po teletubby doll that spoke. One of the things it said was gibberish that sounded somewhat like it was saying f*ggot (personally against the word but can get this across without putting it. Sorry.) six times in a row.

File: 1499251394457.jpeg (33.39 KB, 900x479, 73E7D1A6-5034-43EF-BDB6-8….jpeg)

149cd No.777[Reply]

Just putting this here, you know what to do.

Prengnant was a recent one.
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

ff3cb No.782

It took me a decent amount of time to figure out what it meant.

a29d5 No.840

File: 1500936152058.jpg (507.38 KB, 1277x627, 87e0ac4ce5be9f343886bcdb82….jpg)

What a magical number, it means GOD!

You can't possibly misspell Pregnant.

It's not even a bad word to say in public in 2017.

569d9 No.841

Part of me wishes that's not an edit.

a29d5 No.842

From the next season of Family Guy - they shown this at Comic-con 2017 in San Diego.

d71d3 No.856

I can see why you think it looks like one but I think that's just how family guy is animated

File: 1497582954064.png (22.86 KB, 750x169, IMG_1229.PNG)

40bb8 No.759[Reply]

I'm sure you've all noticed the "Draw her x months pragnent with x babbies!" on the front page. It seems to change hourly. Is it by a bot that randomizes the numbers within certain parameters or what? Seems like a hassle to go in and change it manually every hour or so.
9 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

3b740 No.836

File: 1500761160925.png (3.83 KB, 285x92, best option!.png)

e8e82 No.837

I found this today:
"Pls draw her 8 months pragnent w/ 2 babbies!"
I say she's due any minute, so let's do it ;-)

9181f No.838

I recall a while back seeing something close to "12 months pragnent with 12 babbies" and I'm just thinking "yes please" hahaha

b0103 No.839


This seems too normal for pregchan lol

e8e82 No.849

"Pls draw her 12 months pragnent w/ 12 babbies!"

File: 1501367394476.jpg (619.14 KB, 1200x1737, IMG_0727.JPG)

d1220 No.846[Reply]

OK bit strange this perhaps. Was surfing around and found this animation [video](www.xvideos.com/video4513181/svarog_-_visitors_complete_with_sound)

Somehow she gets impregnated by an alien, gives birth of it..then the baby starts milking..and then giving blowjob to his mum.

Any other video's (hentI/animated) like this? What's the name of this kind of porn?

7a3a9 No.847

It's been so long since I last saw that, but sadly never got the answer to that question either. Probably have seen a few images with similar incest themes but nothing like svarog work.

ce39b No.848

Follow this link

The autors the one
Made this is (komine tsubasa)
But heres the reference what is on that pic

File: 1501259460923.jpg (69.99 KB, 639x1315, wFa0UBy.jpg)

bbf34 No.843[Reply]

Presented without further comment.

f2d3c No.844

6 and 9 and definitely labor

1 is definitely porn

b8a37 No.845

1. Porn
2. Labor
3. Labor
4. Labor
5. Porn
6. Labor
7. Porn
8. Labor
9. Labor
10. Porn
11. Porn
12. Labor
13. Labor
14. Porn
15. Porn
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1500585330728.png (28.94 KB, 375x592, jillian_westbridge_by_veno….png)

37843 No.833[Reply]

My best friend tried to fuck my gf but ended up killing her and himself in a car wreck. I have a very small penis. My PSN is TUPAC-THUG-LIFE5

File: 1478672656446.gif (634.83 KB, 1280x1299, 2b1c4c60-09de-4041-863b-0b….gif)

79a90 No.353[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

I'm having a bad fucking time right now. Probably not the best place for this, but here is thread for those currently having A BAD FUCKING TIME RIGHT NOW.
226 posts and 46 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

64617 No.821

There's no such thing as a truly free market.

9fc76 No.823

False, regulation is still socialism because you are forcing businesses to operate in such a way that the free market would not. It is still state control of the means of production as the 'private' entities must comply with government regulation, giving the government control over how the entity operates. It would be like saying that you can have any car you want (capitalism), as long as it meets our standards (socialism). That is not a capitalist economic model, it is socialist control over private entities.

4a7b5 No.825

No. Socialism is control of the means of production. Some minor constitutional democratic representative republic measures is not inherently socialist. The same way ethics are not Christian morality.

Government itself is not socialist in nature. It's just government. Capitalist markets are still capitalist markets, there are just certain minimum benchmarks and standards for reasonable safety. That is most definitely not the same thing as socialism. The same way government representatives are not inherently fascist for being singular representatives with veto power instead of committees.

Regulation is not inherently socialist. However, socialists like using regulation and bureaucracy to continually tighten the noose, drag people through the coals and bread crumb them and penalize them into doing what they want for the sake of ideology.

So I'd say the difference between socialism and minarchism is the government only does what is absolutely required of it when no private or personal means is rational or reasonable, and socialism is voluntarily surrendering personal responsibility and capitalism in favor of political ideology.

It is through this relationship that socialists continuously try and seize more and more power and control away from individuals so they can't tell where their money goes, or even say no. Stating more and more things should be human rights, and so that gives government power over those things, trumping private business and taxing the fuck out of both industry and private citizens in order to make their hare brained schemes possible. That I find to be completely unacceptable.

They just want so hard to live in a ridiculous rainbow and glitter sprinkled Star Trekian universe, where the federated powers hold ALL the power and individuals dance to the tune of whatever arbitrary declarations made to them.

9fc76 No.829

Regulation, at its core, is imposing the standards of people through the government upon the free market. Socialism, at its core, is the imposition of the standards of the people through government seizure of the means of production. While not as direct, government controls and regulation have a similar result to nationalization insofar as the moral idea of imposing the will of state/majority upon a free market. To a certain extent I suppose you are right, but as you later put, if you can morally justify regulation, you can morally justify nationalization further down the line. Any law or regulation that is necessary would be selected out (for example a company that had poor safety standards would find itself with a smaller, more desperate, or higher cost labor pool, and would be undercut by competitors offering better safety standards).

4a7b5 No.831

The difference is regular old standards SHOULD ideally merely be used in the interests of public health, whereas in socialism they are actively used as a legal truncheon to attack, control and rob from private individuals and corporations. They do not see any line between corporations and private individuals and the government, the state has the inherent right to do whatever they want because they are the state, and there are near to no real concrete tethers to make sure the state isn't being used that way.

It's still not inherently socialistic to have health standards for being able to sell food. Standards that are created by as close to objective scientific necessity is just good sense in public policy, erring on the side of the state only when it'd be a hazard not to.

Whereas with socialism, it's not just the occasional pipe up, it's deliberately crafting health codes so individuals make "better choices" by making sodas cost $10 per 8 oz as "luxuries", trying to morally tax meats out of the market or make it increasingly less and less profitable to produce cattle, poultry or mutton until those businesses have to shut down. But it's all, "in the name of health." Like the WHO would have you believe, effectively not being vegetarian or vegan is a form of violence against not just 3rd world peoples, but the planet, and so meat eating has to go.

Socialism is arbitrary government ideology passing itself off as "the greater good," through legitimized force. If individual rights or businesses aren't part of that "greater good" and the morals and beliefs of said socialist dictators or "representatives" (heads of the party) then they can be quashed and ignored. Or the people re-educated to see what they're doing as exceptions, not violations.

Legitimate representative government with checks, balances and laws is not inherently socialist, else the Berkley nutters would stop crowing about capitalist immorality and talking about America having so much democracy it's detrimental to progress.

File: 1499992630261.jpg (1.12 MB, 1536x2048, IMG_0166.jpg)

b6a18 No.790[Reply]

Patience Johnson nude pregnant bbw

b6a18 No.791

File: 1499992667733.jpg (959.77 KB, 1536x2048, IMG_0170.jpg)


b6a18 No.792

File: 1499992705815.jpg (138.24 KB, 1024x768, IMG_0212.JPG)


df78f No.793

What a beautiful girl!

b6a18 No.794

File: 1500010937498.jpg (94.82 KB, 599x1023, IMG_0235.jpg)

I agree

Delete Post [ ]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
| Catalog
[ b / c / d / f / o / q / r ] [ home ]