/b/ - Random

There is some game called Drop Factory that involves getting pregnant which can be done by fighting monsters or through prostitution.

There's also Violated heroine, and Vitamin Quest, all three are in English, but I can't tell you where to find them sadly.

>>3744
>>3745

i already got those three
but i'm looking for visual novel

also for those who wants to download those games there is this site call F95

Some people have never used an imageboard before. Some people are actually children without proper supervision. It's always easy to suss them out because they don't know how things work. I've seen people who have public accounts on porn websites and have favorited videos even. Some people are just stupid.

>>3297
Nah, more likely just Tenboro being a drama queen as usual.

Never even entered the site lol

Sorry to necro post but has anyone else been having issues accessing their Favorites on Sad Panda as of late?

It works on the base site.

>>3736

No, no issue for me. Maybe try clearing your cache or the cookies for the web site (the latter will force you to log in again)?

>>3737

Just got it to work again.

>>2724
Yeah, so as it turns out, I'm making a pregnancy mod for Stardew, and that's exactly what I needed. Thanks. (If I could get the rest that would be AWESOME.)

Hey Stardew Valley fans (who also have a pregnancy fetish), I've been thinking about making a Stardew Valley Pregnancy Mod (working title) Discord server. Thoughts? (If you want to moderate, or have questions regarding my mod or its progress, contact me on Discord by sending me a friend request @Hotmud9#4382.)

With the big new update I was wondering if there was renewed interest in all of this?

>>3733
I was working on something once, but I’ve since dropped it to work on other things.

However it seems like something you could kinda easily accomplish through SMAPI by finding the function that controls “pregnancy” and baby delivery and connecting it to a return statement. That return statement would then kickstart an in-game timer to countdown the days of the pregnancy and change the sprite accordingly, maybe even the text the characters could display.
…in theory, anyway. I’m no C# expert and my knowledge of SMAPI is kind of old these days.

And cut your fingernails, ffs.

>>3671
Is bleach safe for onaholes? I'd known it to be a strong chemical so I'm worried it may have adverse effects on the rubber material

>Mold
Do not bother cleaning it. its dead. Sorry to say but you probably didnt clean or store it properly. Trash nit, and buy a new one. You do NOT want to risk getting an infection.

do you happen to know exactly what material it’s made from? the comment about bleach is the right direction, but it has to be diluted right, plus i believe how porous a material is impacts the cleaning as well.

Where did you get this onahole? If you remember.

>>3713
On the flip side of this argument:

Are you also saying that people that actually engage in pedophilia/rape/etc. are not turned on by it when browsing porn on the internet?

>>3726
If that pedophile/rapist then goes and eats tablesugar, is the tablesugar tainted, with the knowledge that the rapist enjoys sucrose/table sugar?

A pedophile or rapist enjoying a thing that is not rape or pedophilia, has absolutely no bearing on whether the thing is moral or immoral. How much they're turned on by it is irrelevant to the people that are neither turned on by real underaged human beings nor acting on their urge to harm younger people.

>>3727
There should be a distinction between paedophile and child-rapist. Being atracted to children/childlike-entities make you a pedo by definition. Not all pedophile are child-rapist.
Also your arguments about sugar doesn't work because the is a big differance between eating sugar something almost everybody enjoy while child sexualization is something that few people actually enjoy.
Anyway morality arguments have always been line in the sand so arguing about it is meaningless unless you can publish a study that say "Sexialization of fictional children is good and here's why".

>>3728
And there's a distinction between, "drawing on paper with symbological representation," and "a child." If you have have sex with toy shaped like a vagina, you haven't raped any woman just because cis female human beings bear sexual organs resembling the symbological prop the sex toy represents. No pedophilia has been committed because the person in question has not lusted after a child. You cannot be a pedophile and masturbate to a drawing. Even symbologically, they only represent those things in the abstract.

So again, "This is not a pipe."

And while yes, pedophiles can do an act, the fact a pedophile can engage in the act does not make the act itself pedophilia, especially not when engaged by other people. It would make it a pedophile engaging in the act, not making the act itself pedophilic.

You don't have to be a child rapist in order to be a pedophile, no, but you do have to desire human children. If there's no sexual attraction to living, existing human minors, then there's no pedophilia involved here. Symbols and drawings are not real. Therefore, drawings of children and drawings of murder are neither pedophilic or anti-social. No crime is being committed here. Loli/shota are not sexualization of actual children, which is the definition of pedophilia. They're sexualization of abstracts and fantasies and fiction. Pedophilia requires an an actual human child victim.

And illegal burden of proof reversal. Anything that which is not inherently harmful to another human being is legal and benign. The argument of morality ends where objectivity begins, and unless YOU can put forwards proof that violent video games, novels, fiction of any kind contributes to violence and murder and theft in the real world, unless you can PROVE that someone drawing Rule 34 of South Park, Rugrats, Teen Titans or Muppet babies characters in sexual positions or situations directly harms real life children, then you have no argument.

I do not need to prove sexualization of fictional characters is good. It's neither bad nor good. It's a non-crime and a non-harm. No more than drawing a picture of a politician in the privacy of your own home and burning it is a threat on their life. It is you that needs to prove the objective harm caused by people whom consume loli and shota.

Much like with table sugar, pedophiles that already harm undePost too long. Click here to view the full text.

I have to admit.

This is rather enlightening and I was looking for some shit to say to Blue Checkmarks on Twitter.

Just do anything, even if it's a stupid ass doodle

8====> - - -

I get that a lot added with my need for perfection.

It is not that I am necessarily lazy at least 50% of it isn't,I just have trouble figuring out which line to go to for my drawings.

Yeah,there is little doodling for me. I kinda don't want to waste paper

From my personal experiences, I reach my creative peak when I'm doing something boring, like chores or working dead-end jobs. The writer's block can't stand up to the power of dull boring work.

Only the spaciest and gooiest

I wanted to put a baby in the them but goo is fine too