Just because someone else thinks that they are a gender opposite than the gender they were born as doesn't make it a reality. I don't have to play along with the delusion that someone thinks they're a boy if they are clearly a girl and just doing so to get attention by virtue signaling.
Here's an example. Say you tell me that you are 21 or so. Then I turn around and say, "No, you are not 21, you are 60". Does the simple fact that I said you are 60 make that statement true, despite the fact that it clearly goes against objective reality? Of course not.
It's a similar situation with people who claim that they're trans. They are going against objective reality so that they can virtue signal and play the "victim" as you so eloquently stated that I am doing. They are basing reality on their feelings instead of objective facts, and shaming anyone who doesn't agree with or buy into their delusion into submission. Which is why you tried to shame me by saying
>There is no way to have a logical discussion with someone who thinks this way
Logic is logic, my friend. Logic is based on objective reality. Those who can't, or otherwise refuse, to accept objective reality are part of why society is so screwed up right now. The reason they ignore objective reality is because then they would have to accept the fact that all of their excuses for why they are being victimized are completely invalid, and then they would actually have to take accountability and ownership for where they are at and why they are so miserable. But this truth is so scary and paradigm shattering, that the individual avoids it at all cost to prevent their fragile little feelings from suffering a devastating blow.>>11339
Finally! Someone who gets it. Rock on, bother.