[ b / c / d / f / o / q / r ] [ home ]

/c/ - Chat

Chat, Roleplay and Stories
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

We may be facing further content purges, so please act accordingly.


  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]

c0c6a No.4340[View All]

Hello.

To mark a fresh start, I start a new chat thread here for Impregnator Kings.

Let's all be civil and promote healthy discussion. I will check this thread to answer questions gather feedback address concerns and ask for opinions.

Thank you. I hope the story is enjoyable.
412 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

a53b9 No.8740

This is at best tangentially related to Impregnator Kings, but considering it features Best Girl and one of the newest additions to our cast going head-to-head in a pregnancy competition (tell me that's not something Edward would dream of), I figure I'd share XcelZero's newest Fire Emblem growth poll.
https://www.deviantart.com/xcel-zero/art/Robin-vs-Tharja-Summer-781492345

b40c8 No.8812

Calling it now, Emerald Knight is a woman.

9656a No.8824

Hello everyone. Thread #7 was pushed off page 15 and is now a 404.

However, the archive still has it over here:

https://web.archive.org/web/20180930122947/https://pregchan.com/d/res/33943.html

New update coming soon.

9656a No.8852

Apologies for the late update.

Updating once every two weeks or once a month is not the ideal I want to strive for. I'm hoping to quicken my pace in the upcoming week, if I am able.

9656a No.8913

Hello everyone,

I hope you have enjoyed a return to the quicker pace Impregnator Kings was known for.

We are ending the brief section in which Edward is guaranteed to ask all questions and returning to normal choices.

I do not think I am revealing any big secret to let the readers know that after this scene, Edward will have a series of choices to make one after the other. Potentially.

One of the reason I dislike it when I lapse into a delay in updates is because it throws off the mutual 'rhythm' we all share between voting, updates closing, and updates being posted. I know I missed a few regulars in the last few votes before closing them, but hopefully this warning will help.

Of course, I also know people are also busy or may choose to not use their one vote. That's your right. But in the name of giving fair warning, I just wanted to make it known more choices are coming.

9656a No.8929

The new thread is currently up. As well as a choice.

Thread #8 has been saved for when this thread eventually 404s. ( https://web.archive.org/web/20190601012420/https://pregchan.com/d/res/48104.html )

I'm nervous to rely on archive.org so heavily, but it is the easiest way. It is much easier to follow than simply collecting the raw text, and most sites would not allow the nsfw content anyway.

Thank you for reading along.

9656a No.8930

While I'm at it, I thought maybe cataloguing all the sex scenes I've written for Impregnator Kings would be worthwhile.

This doesn't include very brief asides of "and then Edward had sex with someone." Only full-treatment sex scenes.

For ease of reference and possibly to entice new readers, I also put what positions were used and what the focus of the scene was on.

Thread #1:
1. The matchmaker. (Missionary, the softness of her body.)
2. The female pirate. (Dream sequence. Missionary, the cross-dressing and surprise aspect.)
3. Tharja. (Missionary, her legs around your waist. Defloration, Tharja's excitement.)
4. Tharja. (Handjob.)
5. Tharja. (Hands and knees. Tharja promises to birth six children with each pregnancy over the next 20 years.)
6. Tharja. (Cunnilingus, followed by sex, with legs over shoulders.)

Thread #2:
1. Elizabeth. (Elizabeth on top, Edward unable to use his hands, gradual defloration.)

Thread #3:
1. Elizabeth. (Edward ties Elizabeth up and dominates her.)
2. Beatrice and Tharja. (Edward on top of Beatrice, Tharja on top of Edward.)

Thread #4:
1. Elizabeth and Tharja. (Tharja on Top of Elizabeth, Edward behind them taking his pick of who to penetrate.)
2. Beatrice. (Cunnilingus, Beatrice uses magic to masturbate Edward to orgasm.)
3. Elizabeth. (More binding and domination.)
4. Tharja. (Caressing testicles.)
5. Beatrice. (Edward being dominated, feet-play, Edward with his legs up in a submissive position.)

Thread #5:
1. Tharja. (Tharja straddles Edward in total darkness.)
2. The blacksmith's widowed sister. (Missionary, her not knowing Edward's reputation, an older woman who is still a virgin.)
3. Beatrice. (Sex as an intimate equal. Beatrice in Edward's lap.)
4. Elizabeth. (Impulsive, dominant sex in a closet.)
5. Beatrice. (Cunnilingus, missionary but Edward keeps his hands behind his back.)
6. Erika. (Straddling, Edward masturbates her to orgasm, competition-play throughout.)
7. Beatrice and Tharja. (Foot-worship. Beatrice straddles his thighs. Tharja straddles his face.)
8. Malon. (Missionary, in the hay, first-time.)
9. Malon. (Hands and knees.)
10. Elizabeth and Tharja. (Tharja beneath Elizabeth, Edward on top of Elizabeth. Tharja instructing Elizabeth.)
11. Sully. (Equal position with them both sitting on the bed facing each other, Sully 'clean's Edward's cock with her tongue.)
12. Beatrice. (Beatrice pretends she's pregnant, then straddles and dominates Edward with commands.)
13. Sully. (Sully sits on Edward's lap with her back to his chest and his cock between her thighs, imagining it's her own, then rides him.)
14. Beatrice. (Play at 'seducing' Beatrice, she re-creates her hymen.)

Thread #6:
1. Beatrice. (Sex while clothed.)
2. Sully. (Eager, on the bed)
3. Beatrice. (Fellatio.)
4. Beatrice. (Impulsive sex in her noblewoman-persona.)
5. Tharja. (Tharja on top.)

Thread #7:
1. Sully and Tharja. (Missionary, then bent over.)
2. Sully. (A sexy inspection, in almost-full armor.)
3. Beatrice. (Naked except for a fur, foot-massaging as foreplay, light-domination over Beatrice in missionary.)

Thread #8:
1. Elizabeth. (Worshiping her tiny bump. Then aggressively, up against a wall.)
2. Cordelia. (First-time nervousness. Cordelia has her hands against the wall with her backside exposed.)

9656a No.8952

Hello everyone,

When Impregnator Kings first began, there was a poll on what sort of character people wanted the story to be driven by. This became the basis of Edward.

What I took most from the poll was that people were uninterested in depictions of non-con/rape scenes in the game. I've seen no sign of a shift in this attitude and it is pretty much etched into Edward's personality by now.

However, I feel that this isn't enough to really define what people would like to read or what they are comfortable reading.

Every girl up until now in Impregnator Kings has pretty much asked Edward to give them babies. Robin, we've seen, is not of this mindset at the present state of the story. At what level does resistance, and Edward's charms to penetrate that resistance, cross the line into discomfort for the reader? That is something I have been meditating on and want to find out.

Therefore, I'd like everyone reading who has an interest in Impregnator Kings to respond to the following poll.

This is less "what is rape/non-con," and more "what am I comfortable reading?" At what point does something cross a line?

If you have no opinion there is no need to vote, if you have a strong opinion, please do vote.

This is not a 'majority rules' poll. Nor should you feel constrained to one option. If you wish to elaborate, please do so.

>1. It's okay if the girl acts reluctant at first, and says "yes" before sex.

>2. It's okay if the girl starts off saying firmly "No," as long as she says "yes" before sex.
>3. It's okay if the girl acts reluctant and never says "yes," but never actually verbally says "no," either.
>4. It's okay if the girl starts off saying "no," but then acts like she's getting in to it and doesn't complain or resist after a while, without explicitly saying "yes".
>5. It's okay if the girl starts off saying "no," and still says "no," when sex happens, but it's clear she really doesn't mean it when she says "no." (Her words don't match her actions and she gives her consent in other ways and doesn't really want to stop. Kissing, hugging, wrapping legs, etc.)

Remember, this is less "what qualifies as non-con/rape?" and more "what can I read and still be comfortable?"

I've long had it as a guiding principle that I must write a story people enjoy. If I only write something that depresses people then I have failed as a writer. So, please, if you have any strong opinion, let me know.

3b781 No.8953

>>8952

Option 3.

9656a No.8954

Wait…

I've fucked up my own poll.

Okay, this is ostensibly "I'd be fine reading the option I selected and all levels underneath it but not the options above it." So voting option 3 would mean 1, 2, and 3 are okay for the story, but 4 and 5 are too much.

At least, that was my intent when writing it. If there seems some exception "3 and 1 are fine, but 2 isn't," then go ahead and note it.

I'm really sorry. I should've made that more clear. As of now I just realized "holy shit, I really don't want to misinterpret these results."

>>8953
If that's not what you had in mind when you voted, please re-vote/clarify.

fc61c No.8955

>>8952
I'm okay with all of these situations…. if I had to choose the one that makes me the most uncomfortable out of them, though, it would be #4, with #5 a close second, mostly because of the no explicit "yes" part.

edc4d No.8956

Option 3 is probably the line. Edward has never forced the situation on anyone and generally proceeds with some kind of permission from his partners. No reason that should change now…

62046 No.8957

Option 4-ish seems like the area where Edward's character would corral him to thereabouts, from what we can recall at the moment at least. So, everything therein and about seems fine…? Maybe we didn't read this right either…

2f5b6 No.8958

>>8952
I agree with the other posters. From a character perspective, Edward would draw the line somewhere between option three and four.

Personally I would be also be okay with reading option-five-style content.

034e1 No.8959

Option 1.

I'm trying to read Ed as a fairly "good person." I realize some of these lines get blurred a bit based on period context and immersion, but the reality is that any options outside of Option 1 and *maybe* Option 2 are highly coercive.

I'm not going to go all-in here and virtue signal. I like the story. I've stuck by it for a long time now. I'll likely continue reading it regardless of the outcome of this, but I would still like to interject with the thought that for me personally, an Edward who engages in coercion in a sexual context is going to give me a lot of dissonance in associating him as a "good person."

97997 No.8960

>>8952

3 is probably appropriate for a "good guy" that seduces women - in ANY time period - in fiction. (Notice I said IN FICTION.) We can all act like we'd only ever have sex with a women under the conditions of 1, but that's a little too much virtue signaling for a fantasy about a guy who tries to knock up as many women as possible.

9656a No.8961

Thank you all very much. I think I have a good idea of everyone's expectations now.

To be sure, this wasn't to set the tone or what occurs in the upcoming sex scene with Robin… Robin is an established character and I must honor her personality I've already depicted… but also something for me to take into account for the future.

That being said, if anyone further wishes to reply, please do so. If anyone feels uncomfortable about the tone or content of a future sex scene, please also speak up. This is about reader engagement and comfort, which is important to me. It is not talking about "what constitutes non-con." Non-con will not be depicted in the story, and all scenarios presented were meant to be with a partner who did consent (even 4 and 5). The problem is I am writing from Edward's perspective and not the girl's nor an omniscient, therefore I can't insert explicitly into the narrative "I said no, but really it was more a reflexive action than me really wanting him to stop, and I hoped he'd continue." I realized if I tried something like that from Edward's POV it would probably come across as more rationalizing than an objective truth and possibly taint the scene. Even a later fix (like a conversation afterward where the woman says 'No, that was fun!') probably wouldn't undo the distaste felt. Therefore, this poll, to judge more effectively where the 'line' was in that situation.

Anyway, the update will come soon. Please look forward to it.

1d8a0 No.8962

Fashionably late to the party, and I find myself looking at your question from a 'gameplay' perspective, and the perspective of Edward's personality. Edward will maintain better standing staying within Options 1-3, as well as staying true to his personality.

As for myself, I'm comfortable with all options. As long as there is no trauma caused.

97997 No.8966

Did the last update to the story go missing? I can see it on the front page but it's not there when I go to the thread.

9656a No.8967

>>8966
It's there. You probably just need to refresh.

edc4d No.8972

Well, while there really wasn't a wrong way to go in terms of what Edward was going to tell Robin in the latest poll, my rationale was that going into the history of the Mad Rutting Beast seemed better suited for another occasion (like, sometime after just having had sex with her) and might come off as bragging.

Either way, at least we can put Robin's strategizing skills to use, and maybe this might also show Robin how dumb her parents' plot was.

9656a No.9236

I thought it might be more appropriate to move this discussion over here so as not to clutter the main thread. Specifically regarding this comment:

> (Also if we somehow manage to marry Tharja and Edelgard's children, unification could happen without a war.)


Edward would be aware that marriage between half-siblings (in this case, if he were to impregnate Tharja and Edelberg, and then try to have those two children married) would not be allowed by the Church due to the laws of consanguinity. That is, they'd be too closely related. The only way it would work would be if Edelberg's child was never recognized as his, or if Edelberg had a husband who claimed it as his.

>"Your ceremony with Princess Tharja will be a formality. In the eyes of the Church and the Heavens above, that document is enough to deem you have wed," she says.


>But, what if King Vlad backed out?


>"…Short of a complication due to consanguinity, that isn't possible."


>–What did that mean?


>Your question gets a laugh from your father.


>"It means unless you and Princess Tharja turn out to be brother and sister, you're married. And I can tell you: that's not the case."


Not sure if it's appropriate to interject, but this would have been an idea where Edward would be aware of the complications.

fc07b No.9325

>>9236
Just noticed you posted this here. I was assuming that Edelgard's child wouldn't be recognized by Edward. Kinda pie-in-the-sky thinking, but whatever.

9656a No.9521

Hello everyone.

Given it's the nanowrimo, I am going to attempt to fulfill it this year. This may come in the form of Impregnator King updates or the 'kinktober' requests. This might not necessarily mean the story updates every day, but I will aim for that.

I am going to attempt to have the Faire arc of Impregnator Kings done by December. Or perhaps just a little bit into new years.

That is a goal, but not a promise. I wanted to let everyone know that an end to the Faire will eventually happen and that events are moving apace.

I hope it's enjoyable.

fc07b No.9528

>>9521
Kinktober requests? Is this the genderbent quest version, or something else?

9656a No.9529

>>9528
No, but that I will work on, too. It's this: >>8433

3da26 No.9816

First off, I hope that you're okay Aristocrat, as we haven't heard from you in a while.

Secondly, I saw a post you wrote about a month ago, saying that you're worried about CYOAs going missing. I responded there, and I'll write it here too, to cover my bases: I've been archiving the story as we've gone along, by which I mean that I've been pasting it into a Word doc, and saving the pics. Let me know if you ever need a copy.

4e92b No.9817

>>9816

Aristo does post the occasional update about his progress on deviant art if you haven't seen them

9656a No.9819

>>9816
Thank you for being concerned. I am okay, medically speaking. It's a combination of being busy and stress from being busy that is preventing me from getting back to the story. In the past, my free-time was in blocks that I used to write the story. Now it is in short gasps that interrupt my progress. I am trying to improve and/or adjust.

Yes, I'm worried very much that at this point access to the story would be lost. Not just for me, I have my own logs too, of course, but for others, cutting off any new potential readers. The story is very long now, but I'm hoping it can still be enticing.

At any rate, thank you very much for the offer. >>9817 is right in that I make frequent posts on my DA about the status, including when updates are posted and if there's a choice.

5f579 No.9948

I hope everything's alright. I know it's hard to keep a project going, but signs of life would be welcome about now.

9656a No.9950

>>9948
There will be an update monday. Even if it's small.

Sorry for the delay. It's a combination of stress and responsibilities.

5f579 No.9951

With the state of the world right now, I just wanted some confirmation that you weren't dead. Sorry to be a bother like that.

9656a No.9953

>>9951
It's understandable and not a bother at all. It is motivating to know people still want the update. Thank you.

9fe5a No.9954

>>9953

We're with you, Aristo. Still living in hope we finally get to Edward's fully pregnant harem.

9656a No.9990

I'm… confused. It seems some of the wayback machine links of previous chapters in the main index/explanation of the story now re-direct to earlier captures of the site, which mean some threads are missing half their content. The urls are not the same, they just re-direct to a different, older url.

Thread 5 and Thread 7 seem to be the affected ones. The others are fine.

Thread 7's archive should be from Sept. 30th 2018. Thread 5's should be from June 19th 2017. Instead, they are from March 7th 2018, and December 26, 2016. These are not even close.

Has anyone else noticed this? How long has it been like this?

I myself have my own copies of the threads, so they are fine, but this is concerning.

9656a No.9991

Apparently sometimes captured pages disappear because of maintenance and this is temporary. I am hoping that's the case here.

If not… I may have to find some other solution.

9656a No.9994

>>9990
Okay, Thread #5 is back to normal. Hopefully Thread #7 will soon be too.

Next update will be soon. I hope everyone's enjoying the return to the usual pace. The ideal pace.

43943 No.10010

>>9994
I know I'm enjoying the uptick in pace. Thanks for keeping us in mind.

9656a No.10021

I'm beginning to seriously wonder if thread 7 will come back in full. I'll give it another week. If it doesn't, I may experiment with posting the text after the cut-off in a chat thread. It will lack images, but I don't keep them after I initially post them.

Hopefully this will be okay.

In the meantime, I want to bring up a genuine consideration.

I always aim to update the story as much as possible but as it has been clear, sometimes I'm unable to.

Lower page numbers and more users posting images means Impregnator Kings slips down to the 'danger' zone of being pushed off the site.

I don't want to just 'bump' the thread whenever this happens. It's unfair to other users.

But, I also want to maintain the latest thread without worrying about it being removed.

There is no section of the site dedicated to CYOA stories which work best with both text and images. I have no right to 'demand' one.

However, someone suggested I just use /b/.

This could be an option that solves the problem. /b/ gets much less traffic. The last post on page 10 is July of last year. In /d/ the last post on page 10 is mid-late March of this year.

Furthermore, it means that full threads will be kept as an archive on the site longer before I need to rely on the wayback machine to keep the thread.

However… I don't want to make anyone uncomfortable by a move to /b/. We all know what /b/ is. There's plenty of threads in /b/ that are not very positive. Impregnator Kings depends on votes to exist. I don't want to lose voters or potential voters because they must 'wade into' /b/.

So, therefore, I want to ask as a future consideration: what is your reaction to the idea of moving the next Impregnator Kings thread to /b/?

At any rate, it will only become an issue in the future, so it's only something to think about. But if the bulk of voices is "I'd be okay with it," then I won't suffer much stress from the idea.

Don't hesitate to say 'bad idea' if you really think so.

5f579 No.10023

Hard to say. For archiving, I think we might have to edit/compress the story into chapters and post it somewhere else. Images will be lost, as will votes ad related flavor text. But the core content would be somewhere that doesn't drop old data as quickly.

For the rest… I think we'd have to get consensus. Homesteading in known hostile territory is always a risk, and takes support to succeed.

43943 No.10027

>>10023
I've mentioned this before, but I have an archive of this sort already. A bunch of word docs, marked in places where the pictures appear, and the pics saved with matching numbers. (though there was a hiccup in numbers when I had laptop problems and had to get a new one, I should have all the content). However, I understand if that isn't what our illustrious DM would want, as he/she/they probably enjoy the banter of the players. Still, my archive of the adventure is available upon request.

>>10021
/b/ is a tricky beast. Just reading the first couple pages makes me hesitant to go there. I'll follow if it goes there anyway, but I would hope that those that frequent /b/ would either join in the fun, or leave us be.

14a6e No.10028

>>10021
I'd be okay with it.

f4932 No.10029

/d/ is already fairly /b/-like on any given day anyway, so let's not take a /b/lue pill please.

9656a No.10030

>>10029
I'm not sure what this means. This means don't go to /b/?

f4932 No.10031

>>10030
Correct.
"On second thought, let us not go to /b/. It is a silly place."

5f579 No.10032

So what would you suggest as an alternative? Because the current way of things is probably not going to work much longer. We're already one bad case of writer's block away from the project getting swept to oblivion, and it's only going to get worse.

c0ba0 No.10033

>quest threads

/d/ is the artwork board

i think you're looking for /b/

9656a No.10034

>>10032
I really must express my thanks that you are so invested in the story. I'm sorry if it's causing you undue anxiety about it possibly being lost to the gradual evaporation of all content from the internet.

That said, don't worry. Even if there isn't an update every day, it doesn't mean I'm not around and 'conscious' of where the story is at.

The only way Impregnator Kings really slips into oblivion is if I die. In which case, if I have advance notice of the impending death, I'll try to let everyone know my ideas for where the story was going to go. Anyway, that's not happening, at least for the foreseeable future.

For now we'll continue, at least until the current thread is full.

>>10027
I really do appreciate this, Shadow. Is there anyway you could make this available, such as on megaupload or some such thing? It probably would be an easier fix. Or at least a back-up for when these hiccups with the Wayback Machine happen. If it would cause you undue stress, don't worry about it.

I do like a notation of "This option was voted," otherwise it does sometimes become confusing, but don't stress if that isn't there.

The banter I do follow so I know what people expect and how best to meet expectations. I'm not sure how newcomers who read the threads for the first time interpret it.

9656a No.10035

On that note, it seems that finally the archive of thread #7 is working properly again! This is a morale booster for me.

43943 No.10037

>>10034

Here's me seeing if this will work. First link is the first three years (2015-2017), and the second link is 2018 & 2019.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rLIO3bLM-A15dCyu5SyDs7SgeEbJ-LiF
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1vMW_GhoRFk9N_cWMhiYZ564OHHJQ-5Ru


[View All] (412 posts omitted)
[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ b / c / d / f / o / q / r ] [ home ]