does she get fucked or does she use sperm donations?
Neither because it's fake, it's why she never has bare stomach photos this late in the pregnancy.
Not to mention surrogacy is expensive and takes a bit of time, but somehow this bitch is always pregnant 3 weeks after dropping her last multiple litter with more multiples.
just read through her blog. Any conceivable (lol) question you could ask, she's answered at some point>>7417http://preggoalways.tumblr.com/post/167538809350/live-pic
because fake bellies have stretch marks, lemme tell ya. also, are you aware of how much a fake belly costs? to get one for every week of a pregnancy, for varying amounts of babies? You'd need a mortgage
And you're a sucker if you actually think that pic is hers. Follow along with me for a moment, and the whole thing stinks:
- It's completely implausible that somebody who's supposedly so open about their pregnancy fixation would take so few bare belly pics. Seriously, the ratio is like 20 to 1. She doesn't even show the underbelly, even in pics where you'd expect it.
- Of the few bare belly pics that there are, "her" belly is always considerably smaller and flabbier than it is in the clothed pictures. In the clothed pics, it's nearly perfectly spherical, which implies an inflatable device; real bellies are heavy and sag a bit.
- Additionally, almost all of her clothed pics (with the fake belly underneath) are taken in the same bedroom and similar lighting conditions. In contrast, all of the bare or naked pics are just belly close-ups, with very different camera style, with absolutely nothing to suggest they were taken in the same place. Seriously, go ahead and try to find a bare belly pic where the sheets match what's on her bed most of the time. I guarantee that you won't find one.
You seem to be unnecessarily anal about this whole thing
*backs away slowly*>>7420
I think I've agitated a flat Earther… flat bellyer? I deserve to go to jail for that pun.
flat bearther ~ theeeeere we go
It's very odd that all her bare belly pics are about the same size flabby belly, where her clothed pics are a large round belly with prominent "outie." Compare the 16 weeks bare belly picture with the 32 weeks picture, and they're not dramatically different (but the clothed pics are HUGE—bigger in fact than actual multiples). Add to that some wide-angle lenses, extreme cropping and close-ups to prevent easy identification, and it's easy to let the fantasies of the viewer take over. The idea that her body and belly shows so little damage after 14(!) pregnancies, never mind multiples, is astoundingly unlikely (ask The Bug about how you look after ONE multiple pregnancy). I've never seen a woman whose body was not pretty well wrecked after 5 or 6 pregnancies.
I'm not saying she's not pregnant at all, but I am saying flat-out that she doesn't look pregnant with twins and I cannot believe she has been pregnant more than a few times in her life. Fantasy is fine, but it's good to know the difference.
You mean a fake belly? Which is exactly what it looks like?
Look, the point is that the raw volume of her 'belly' *increases* when her clothes are on, which is the opposite of what you'd expect in reality. Taking a fairly flabby, soft belly and putting it into a support harness would compress its volume, not double it.
when you take saggy flesh and put it in a sling, it becomes firm, round and massive. Ya know, like breasts in a bra? You do know how bras work, yes?
you enjoy your conspiracy theories bro. I comprehend physics, so ya can't convince me. (or really anyone who's felt the weight of a breast in their hand before)
Yeah, whatever. I'm just going on forty plus years of staring at pregnant bellies and learning about anatomy, lighting and physics to be able to render them believably. It's clear you enjoy your fantasy, from your exalted position of Casanova of the pregnant universe, from which you look down on mere mortals. I literally have zero interest in your beliefs or altering them.
BTW, "heavy cropping" is a photographic term. Look it up, and see if it doesn't fit. Otherwise, point me to the full body shots that are NOT shot with a 12mm fish-eye that give an honest sense of proportion, because a belly taken out of context, warped all to fuck with a super wide angle lens, can be believed to be any size one's fevered imagination desires.
And here's an on-topic picture, so that this isn't a COMPLETE waste of time.
Its just not that deep, fam
Any more of her?
holy christ she's gigantic i got a funny feeling in my pants.
Valid points. The blog's extraordinary story seems dubious. No sense in ignoring reason just to be contrary.
Who is she ?
holy shit what got into her? she's huge. i swear its as if woman are sleeping with patrick ross from species 2.
id keep her preggo forever..
they're fakes, that's a dude
these images have been the source of controversy on pregchan for years now. Some argue it's a crossdresser, some argue it's not, and there isn't enough evidence from either point of view to put the argument to rest.
>inb4 this thread becomes an arguing thread
bump for more.
Annoying blogger, but the wife is sexy: https://youtu.be/8ZzE9Rbpsyo?t=360
the goddess demisty shes one of my favorites. please myself all night to her.
I'd like to see more tbh. They are so old and mysterious.
so big and beautiful.
[View All] (159 posts and 86 image replies omitted)
For a minute there, I thought Kelly Hart was pregnant again.