>>3532 I bet Falloutghoul always simps for the NCR when playing New Vegas because he can't see how openly imperialistic it is. Degenerates like him belong on a cross.

>>3531 Lots of fancy words you're probably copying and pasting from /pol/. >DPRK has not invaded a single country They invaded South Korea in the 1950s. >U$ Empire has invaded almost every country on the planet. ...you really don't know how many countries there are, do you? I could go on, but I'm not going to be able to talk reason to you. You're too far gone into your conspiracy theories. Go back to /pol/ you fucking tourist.

Don't engage Maofag, people; retard genuinely believes Mao saved China. He's beyond help.

>>3534 Nope I’m writing this out myself >They invaded South Korea in the 1950s. south ‘korea’ practically invaded them first and south ‘korea’ is occupied territory an illegitimate colonial state much like south ‘vietnam’ so even if it was the DPRK that started it they would simply be attempting to liberate occupied territory. > ...you really don't know how many countries there are, do you? Look at the chart (see picture) > I could go on, but I'm not going to be able to talk reason to you. You're too far gone into your conspiracy theories No conspiracy theories but Marxist-Leninist analyses from an actual left wing perspective and not a fake woke one. Then again conspiracy theory is a term to silence any form of criticism of western systems or anything that’s not mainstream thought. Ratwiki even thinks that Marxist class analysis is a conspiracy theory. >Go back to /pol/ you fucking tourist. They think the synthetic woke ‘left’ are a communists a lot of people on 4chan are rather ignorant of political theory like that.

>>3536 It's reassuring to know that >not real socialism Applies to both tankies and woketards

>>3536 A good chunk of countries listed there were aggressors, taken over by extremists or attempted to genocide ethnic minorities. For someone who proclaims to stand against imperialism, racism and fascism you surely love defending those policies, lol.

>>3533 left wing commies all deserve to be executed disagree, you are one fuck head

>>3579 The Abu Ghraib prison scandal in 2004 Iraq under the US Army when guards tortured those who are known to did the same thing towards political prisoners during the Saddam Hussein regime.

>>3637 What does this has to do with US bombing or not bombing different countries?

nigger

I was wrong about the Twitter Nazis, they changed my mind. They're pretty great and extremely based. Sorry for all the trouble guys.

>>3748 Now you're impersonating me? For shame.

>>3749 I'm a Stupid Moron With an Ugly Face and A Big Butt and my Butt Smells and I Like to Kiss My Own Butt

>>3776 >>literally elementary school-level insults What the actual fuck even is this shit?

>>3587 And you deserve to live a happy life free from worry. But, you didn't get that because the leftists who could deliver it to you were executed in your scenario.

>>3780 Emotionally immature people who can't handle the fact that they were called Nazis.

>>3780 >>3790 >people on this board are too young to even get a basic simpsons reference

>>3781 >But, you didn't get that because the leftists who could deliver it to you were executed in your scenario. I didn't realize life in the gulags was such a happy event. Makes you wonder why people were so desperate to leave the soviet union.

>>3794 Allow me to clarify: libertarian leftists will give you a better life. Auth left will kill you in famines and camps. But I'm sure your rebuttal to anarchism is something-something muh law and order

>>3795 Bit of an oxymoro innit? You can't be libertarian while also demanding more government regulations.

>>3793 I mean, I'm just not hugely into the Simpsons tbh. Given the nature of the thread, forgive me for assuming it was just someone going full retard.

>>3790 How can you call people emotionally immature,when seeing a hashtag you don't like causes you to cry about Nazis? >>3781 >>3795 For the past few decades it's anarchists/libertarian socialists/democratic socialists who had bigger sway on the left than auth left and they're the ones screeching 24/7 that everyone who isn't 100% in agreement with them and who doesn't consider Leo Trotsky the greatest man ever is a Nazi. Also their ideology boils down to "Fuck you, Mom and Dad, imma go burn shit down, loot everything and abolish police and prisons, then the world magically becomes a literal utopia." Anarchism is another ideology for teens who want to be edgy, but Nazism/Fascism and old-fashioned Communism/Marxism don't bring them hits of dopamine.

YOU GUYS ARE ALL FUCKED WHEN THE LIZARD PEOPLE COME OUT OF THE SEWERS AND ENSLAVE HUMANITY WE SHALL ALL KNOW THE POWER OF GRU'UL. HAIL THE LIZARD PEOPLE, HAIL TO THE TRUE RULER OF ZAK'R.

>>3809 >Thinking farm tools will ever take over the world What a grand and intoxicating innocence.

>>3800 I mean, look at Ben Shapiro. And the modern Republican Party as a whole. It's all just a fascist insurgency to turn the USA into a theocratic oligarchy.

>>3811 Jesus Christ you have to be a full on fucking retard to accuse a fucking Jew of being a Nazi.

>>3812 They said facist, not Nazi.

>>3813 Same difference.

>>3462 its ok were here too

>>3812 Shapiro is in a really weird spot to be honest. He's conservative as all fucking hell, but he does seem to genuinely believe that it's not the government's place to enforce conservative views. I still don't like the guy whatsoever, but I don't think he's *quite* into fascist territory. Problem is, he doesn't speak out nearly enough against the actual fascists that claim to share his views.

Lmao, 21st century leftists are literal 70 IQ drooling retards. >It's all just a fascist insurgency to turn the USA into a theocratic oligarchy. The fuck is this word diarrhea? None of this makes sense, you troglodytes have been screeching that everyone not on board with communism/anarchism/whatever is a big no-no evil fascist bully who wants a religious dictatorship for almost 100 years now and neither the world nor the USA is any close to that. >They said facist, not Nazi. You tards can't even spell fascist correctly yet claim to be Antifa freedom fighters who know that the way to go is anarchism and everybody who doesn't agree is an uneducated peasant. I thought it was just MuchBirth being this retarded, but turns out his entire side of the political aisle is made of imbeciles and spazzes. >I still don't like the guy whatsoever, but I don't think he's *quite* into fascist territory. >Problem is, he doesn't speak out nearly enough against the actual fascists that claim to share his views. "You breath air? So did Hitler" energy. A shitload of postmodernist thinkers and New Left ideologues insisted that there's nothing wrong with incest and pedophilia, you need to have sex with children or at least show them porn or else they become fascist and a number of them did touch and fuck kids. When will you denounce pedos on your side, lefties? My guess is never, and you'll wheel out "but le Catholic clergy and conservative politicians diddle kids too, that means my side can diddle them too, it's not a problem". Why are left-wingers such retards and lunatics?

>>3838 I know this is almost definitely fucking bait, but screw it. What kind of absolute fucking retard sees someone say "he honestly should probably tell the people misappropriating his views to push literal insanity that, no, that's not what he actually means" and thinks to themselves, "gee, this person must support fucking pedophiles"? How the fuck have you managed to shove your head so far up your ass that you genuinely believe pedophilia is somehow a fucking partisan issue? The absolute furthest the debate goes is regarding whether it's a fucking treatable mental illness and the like. Anybody who genuinely tries to claim that it's perfectly fine to fuck children is equally reviled by both sides. The only reason anyone on the left brings up the priest bullshit is because it's a legitimate widely-known problem that has actively been covered up and swept under the rug by the church for fucking AGES, and yet the right, rather than actually fucking take a stand and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, goes and throws a fit about the gays or trans people.

>>3843 >The only reason anyone on the left brings up the priest bullshit is because it's a legitimate widely-known problem It's literally less of a problem then the amount of teachers that tounch kids. Hell even if you take in consideration per capita rates Teachers are twice as likley to touch kids than priests yet it never gets brought up as a concern when it equally was covered up for years.

>>3838 >shoutingwithhimself

>>3800 only someone who's politically illiterate actually thinks its an oxymoron. Who do you think even coined the term "libertarianism" in the first place? Ill give you a hint, it wasn't someone on the right

>>3844 >>implying that highlighting a specific case means you suddenly don't give a shit about every other case While it doesn't generally make national news except in very rare cases, when a teacher gets caught diddling kids, it's a huge fucking deal at least at the local level. The problem people have with the church shit is that they'll somehow fucking turn it all around on the fucking victim, because it makes SO much sense that the little altar boy fucking seduced some decrepit old bastard. These are people that claim to be the messengers of God. By all accounts, the particularly religious should be even more furious that someone would do something so horrible while acting as a holy man. But instead, you resort to what-about-ism and try to make fucking pedophilia a fucking partisan issue. It's absolute insanity.

>>3843 Half of Shitter thinks age of consent laws were created by homophobic Nazis. The half who's bios say "ACAB|BLM|Socialism now|Death to Nazis". And for past 30 years at least, whenever news about pedos pop up, everyone says "Must be the Catholics again" even if it's a random criminal diddler off the street. >>3845 So where's your argument to vote for libertarian left? >>3848 Teachers diddling kids don't make the news often because liberals in all the newspapers, networks and blogs ignore it, downplay it or scream "Muh Christian pedos". There are more than enough news about teachers facing zero to no punishment after abusing kids and just quietly transfering to another school. And the right is doing something to put a stop to it. The pedo clergy aren't covered for like they used to be just 20-30 years ago. Meanwhile, the left does nothing about sexual abuse of kids in schools or gay community. Except, again, ignoring, downplaying it, shifting the blame or bringing "But muh Church does it too and no-one gets mad, why are you mad at teachers/gays doing it?"

>>3871 Your entire fucking argument literally boils down to "b-buh my side doesn't do it as much as the libtards". Stop trying to make it a partisan issue, everyone hates fucking pedophiles. And actually listening to the retards on Twitter as if they legitimately represent anybody is your own damn fault. Also, learn to sage, you fucking mongoloid.

>>3882 The lefties in this thread are the ones insisting that their side is clean and whenever somebody rapes kids it must be clergy. Also if both sides hated pedos the internet wouldn't be chock full of leftists claiming that age of consent laws are homophobic and racist. And you're very optimistic if you think this type of retards is only prevalent on Twitter.

>>3883 >thinks that lunatics on the internet actually represent the views of the majority of left-leaning people Another mark for you on the retard checklist, good job! Also, again, learn to fucking sage, shit-for-brains.

>>3884 California pushed a bill through to make it so individuals that engaged in anal sex with minors weren't immediately put onto the sex offenders registry. The reason literally because they believed the current registry targeted Homosexuals. Let that sink in, a liberal ran government not just some random discord pedos, cared more about not offending a group of people than it did the children they raped.

>young adults >within 10 years of their age Considering the existence of so-called "Romeo and Juliet" laws in MANY states, no, this actually does do exactly what they set out to do in making sure it doesn't unfairly target gay people. The law prior left it up to a judge in cases where it *wasn't* anal. This literally just puts them on the same footing. The fact that you genuinely think "oh, this means gay people can rape kids without repercussions" shows just how much of a retard you are. This is basically only relevant to cases where an 18 year-old fucks their 17 year-old girlfriend or boyfriend and the like. The judge still has full power to put them on the registry if they so choose, it's just not an automatic placement. It took literally 5 minutes of research and basic reading comprehension to figure that out, so where does that leave you, fuckhead? Also, sage your fucking retardation already.

>>3887 >Unironically defending a law that makes it legal for an 18 year old to fuck a 10 year old without any repercussions Holy shit and you're the one calling people retarded. Way to fucking play the stereotype of a pedo defending liberal without any sort of question.

>>3888 That bill didn't make it legal, and it only applies to minors aged 14 through 17 years old. It gave judges discretion on whether to order the convicted to register as a sex offender. Stop trolling with bad faith arguments and actually read what you post.

>>3889 Precisely what this anon said; it's still illegal, and there are repercussions. They're just no longer automatically placing someone on the registry for doing the exact same thing in a different hole. Seriously, takes like 5 minutes of research. Not calling you a retard without a reason here; you've been providing plenty of evidence to prove that status.

>>3885 I see you kept this screencap from over three years ago, probably toss it in frequently to "spruce up" your vacuous arguments.

>>3889 >>3890 >Still ignoring that 10 year age gap It's really telling how defensive you guys are of a law that is fine with 17 year olds fucking 7 year olds. Like are we really going to ignore that a 10 year gap is unnecessarily large for the purposes of this law or are we still gonna gaslight like this isn't an issue?

>>3892 It literally does not work that way. The youngest it applies to is a 14 year old. So, 24 year-old and 14 year-old. It doesn't go younger than that. I personally agree that 10 years is probably a bit excessive, but the fact is that previously, you would automatically end up on the registry if you got a handjob, blowjob, or did anal, but that wasn't true for vaginal. Now, none of them automatically put you on the registry. It was a fucking bizarre distinction that made no sense and happened to disproportionately affect people who weren't straight.