>>2960 I think it's bound to happen if you're in love with your wife/girlfriend

I think maiesiophilia is a matter of degree, not presence. Most men are probably only attracted to pregnancy when it's their partner.

>>2963 i know some even find pregnancy a turnoff with their partners... or at least claim to. smells a lot like an excuse for guys who aren't actually invested in the relationship to explain their cold feet (or outright cheating) once they're at that level of commitment i want to say i've also heard that the hormone shifts can kill a woman's sex drive, but for the ones who do find it increased, there's no way they don't get hooked on it. my hypothesis is that a majority of mothers become bisexual after having such a complete experience of womanhood, and this doesn't get noticed just because they're still satisfied with their current male partners

That's how it was for me. I'm female with a pregnancy/breeding kink and the hormones made me completely, 100% turned off to it. You just don't hear about it as often but it's just as common.

>>3181 >my hypothesis is that a majority of mothers become bisexual after having such a complete experience of womanhood You're pornsick and retarded.

>>2963 Yeah, fair enough. I do think that "large families" these days are largely products of breeding or pregnancy fetishes. Birth control is too ubiquitous these days for couples to accidentally have 6 children. I know a couple who are having their 6th child. They are not rich or particularly religious. The wife has literally been pregnant on and off for 12 years straight. No way that's not some pregnancy or breeding fetish.

>I am also convinced that couples that have more than 3 children (these days) are not working out some kind of pregnancy fetish, unconsciously or not. I'm of the opinion that a large chunk of couples with more than 2-3 children have at least one pregnancy fetishist involved. It can't be just religious or political conservatism.