You seem to be awfully certain. Maybe your mind has not been changed, but I like to think the best of people until they give me reason to think otherwise. And that includes the ability and willingness to change one's mind when confronted with new arguments. (And just because you have heard it before, does not mean that it is "the same old argument" to everyone. Remember that it was new to you at some point as well.)
And, again, my argument is actually more subtle than your one-liner suggests. I am not saying that theft of digital goods cannot exist. (Although, for the record, I am saying that downloads do not fall in that legal category and using that word is highly inappropriate.)
My point is that there is a certain value attached to these goods and this values correlates with what an economically reasonable person is willing to pay for it.
In other words: Behind the (hyperbolic, I know) accusation that someone is responsible for starving artists by downloading comics here or on other website without paying the artist (and behind similar accusations that downloading mp3s costs the music industry billions etc.), there is an underlying assumption that there would have been such a payment if the opportunity to download for free had not existed.
That assumption is what I challenge. My claim is that it is absolutely reasonable to expect that there would indeed be no payment, completely independent of access to these downloads, simply because the price that is asked for these goods is too high, too far above the price that a functioning market would lead a reasonable person to expect.
Let me make the following (imperfect, I know) analogy to illustrate my point: Imagine your neighbour's kid offers to mow your lawn for you, but is asking a thousand bucks for it. Even if you are feeling especially charitable and want to support that kid and even if you could afford it, you would not pay that amount because it is completely out of proportion with the actual value you receive (even accounting for your charitable attitude toward that kid and general approval of his/her impulse to work for money etc.)
And if that kid's parents then proceed to question your morality based on your decision (and call you all sorts of names for it), you would understandably feel like you are being treated unfairly and unreasonably.
That is what Post too long. Click here to view the full text.